|
GIS Guide to Good Practice |
|
3.3 Generic Issues
3.3.1 Projections and co-ordinate systems
Projection is the process by which the irregular three-dimensional form
of the earth's surface is represented systematically on a two-dimensional
plane, most commonly in the form of a map. Closely linked to the topic
of projection is that of co-ordinate systems, which enable us to locate
objects correctly on the resulting flat maps. Although we can locate objects
on the globe using geographical co-ordinates expressed in units of latitude
and longitude, most commonly we utilise a Cartesian or planar co-ordinate
system with a fixed origin, a uniform distance unit of measure, and a pair
of perpendicular axes usually termed Easting and Northing. Identification
of the projection that was used in the creation of a data source is an
essential first step in incorporating it into a spatial database. For very small study areas, it is sometimes acceptable to ignore projection,
and to assume that the region of interest is comprised of a flat, two-dimensional
surface. However, if the study region is larger than a few kilometres,
or if information is to be included from data sources, e.g. mapsheets,
which have been constructed with different projections, then a GIS needs
to understand the projection used for each layer in order to avoid inaccuracies. Projection consists of two main stages: first the surface of the earth
is estimated through the use of a geometric description called an ellipsoid
(sometimes, though not always correctly, referred to as a spheroid), and
secondly the surface of this ellipsoid is projected on to a flat surface
to generate the map. Ellipsoids are defined in terms of their equatorial
radius (the semi-major axis of the ellipse) and by another parameter, such
as the flattening, reciprocal flattening or eccentricity. However, as a
user of GIS, the ellipsoid definition is usually uncomplicated to incorporate.
Most of the ellipsoids which have been used to generate maps have names
such as the 1830 'Airy' spheroid (used by the Ordnance Survey) or the 'International'
or 'Hayford' ellipsoid of 1909, and it should be sufficient to provide
the full name of the ellipsoid used (for a simple introduction to ellipsoids
see Defence Mapping Agency 1984). There are a huge variety of methods available for undertaking the projection
itself. Since by their very nature projections are a compromise, each method
produces a map with different properties. In a cylindrical projection,
for example, the lines of latitude (parallels) of the selected ellipsoid
are simply drawn as straight, parallel lines. In the resulting map the
parallels become shorter with distance from the equator, and to maintain
the right-angled intersections of the lines of latitude and longitude,
the lines of longitude (meridians) are also drawn as parallel lines. This
maintains the correct length of the meridians, at the expense of areas
close to the poles which become greatly exaggerated in an east-west direction.
A transverse cylindrical projection is created in the same manner, but
the cylinder is rotated with respect to the parallels and is then defined
by the meridian at which the cylinder touches the spheroid rather than
the parallel. The Mercator projection exaggerates the distance between meridians by
the same degree as the lengths of the parallels, in order to obtain an
orthomorphic projection. A transverse Mercator is similar, but based on
the transverse cylindrical projection. There are also many other forms
of projection which are not based on the cylinder, including conical projections
(based on the model of a cone, placed with its vertex immediately above
one of the poles) and entirely separate families of projections such as
two-world equal area projections and zenithal projections. Depending on the projection used, different parameters will need to
be specified in order to define it. Basic projections are often modified
through the use of correction factors. In transverse projections, for example,
it is not uncommon for a scaling factor to be applied to the central meridian
to correct for the east-west distortion of the projection itself. A projection
may also use a false origin, which arbitrarily defines a point on the projection
plane to be the point 0,0. False origins are normally used to ensure that
all co-ordinates in the area of the projection have positive values. All projections have limits beyond which one or more of their attributes will
become too distorted. For example, the Transverse and Universal Transverse
Mercator projections work well only for a narrow east-west width - around 6 degrees
of longitude - beyond this limit the distortion increases rapidly. When choosing
a map projection it is essential to check the details of both the capabilities
and the limitations of any given projection method against the nature of
the area of interest: size, extents, nature of use, etc. Details of projection procedures can be found in a variety of standard
texts, for example Bugayevsky and Snyder 1995;
Snyder 1987;
Evenden 1983;
1990. Standard software for specifying and
undertaking cartographic projection is available for a variety of platforms. Probably the most flexible is
the PROJ 4 product of the USGS discussed by
Evenden 1990. Geographical co-ordinates, expressed in angles of latitude and longitude are used
to locate features upon the globe whereas planar Cartesian co-ordinate
systems are used to locate features upon projected maps. In a planar co-ordinate
system, the relative positions of objects represented upon a given mapsheet
can be specified using standard units of distance measured with respect
to a fixed origin point. The precise characteristics of a given co-ordinate
system depend heavily upon the projection used to generate the 2-dimensional
representation; as a result coordinate systems are as numerous as projection systems. For example, there are five primary coordinate systems in use in the US, a
country with a very broad east-west extent. Some of these are based upon the
properties of specific map projections and others on historical land division
strategies (DeMers 1997: 63). By contrast, a single planar co-ordinate system based upon the transverse
Mercator projection is used for all recent mapping for Great Britain, which is
elongated north-south but narrow east-west. The British National
Grid uses the Airy spheroid for its datum, and its origin is located at 49 degrees
North, 2 degrees West. There is a false origin defined at 400,000, -100,000 such
that the central meridian is the Zero easting of the National Grid -
which is also aligned to the 2 degree West meridian of Longitude.
Additionally, the scale along the central meridian is 0.9996012717 (as opposed
to the more normal scale of 0.9996 for the Transverse Mercator projection): this
results in distances along the northing 180,000, almost exactly half way across
Great Britain, being to true scale. The units of the National Grid are metres measured
east and north from the origin. A similar Transverse Mercator projection, but with an
origin further to the west, is used for Ireland. It is important to realise that projections and the resultant planar
co-ordinate systems vary across nations and through time. The British National
Grid has only been in use since the 1940s. British mapping prior to this time was
based upon the Cassini projection and used an independent datum for each
county. This mapping is often termed the County Series. A
problem common to all situations where multiple datums are in use for any one
country is that features which cross the borders of the different datums may not
match when the respective map sheets are brought together. This problem
certainly exists in the pre-war British mapping and is also present in the
State-Plane system in use in the US today. As with the British Ordnance Survey, many national mapping agencies use local projections designed
to suit the size and shape of the area covered by their maps. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
system is a planar projection where degrees of longitude and latitude form a rectangular grid. Since distortion tends to increase most markedly on either side of the central meridian with
this projection, UTM is used for narrow north-south oriented zones. The world is divided into zones each covering
6 degrees of longitude and numbered in an easterly direction
from 1, centred on 177 degrees west, to 60, centred on 177 degrees east.
Within each zone, a transverse Mercator projection is established with
its origin at the intersection of the central meridian with the equator.
The false origin is offset so that the central meridian is at 500,000 metres
east. The false Northing is zero metres in the northern hemisphere and
10,000,000 metres in the southern hemisphere. The scaling factor on the
central meridian is 0.99960. Despite its world-wide applicability, UTM has
some disadvantages. Different ellipsoids may be required in different parts
of world, and transformations between zones are required when the area
of interest covers more than one zone. The UK, for example, is mostly in
zone 30, but areas east of the Greenwich meridian fall into zone 31. The US
State-Plane co-ordinate system is an application of UTM. The use of three-dimensional absolute co-ordinates from satellite positioning
systems introduces further complications. These systems measure the relative
positions of receiver and satellites using an 'Earth-Centred, Earth-Fixed' Cartesian co-ordinate system (ECEF). This system, which is aligned with
the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) reference ellipsoid, has its origin
close to the earth's centre of mass, its z axis parallel with the direction
of the conventional terrestrial pole and its x axis passing through the
intersection of the equator and the Greenwich meridian. Fortunately most
receivers convert ECEF co-ordinates to WGS 84 latitude, longitude and height
for output, and some will also perform transformations to other datums and
co-ordinate systems, for example to the Great Britain National Grid. |
The right of Mark Gillings, Peter Halls, Gary Lock, Paul Miller, Greg Phillips, Nick Ryan, David Wheatley, and Alicia Wise to be identified as the Authors of this Work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All material supplied via the Arts and Humanities Data Service is protected by copyright, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of it is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your personal research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. Permission for any other use must be obtained from the Arts and Humanities Data Service(info@ahds.ac.uk). Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise, to any third party.
|